Safe-Side Scenarios for Financial and Biometrical Risk

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Safe-Side Scenarios for Financial and Biometrical Risk. / Christiansen, Marcus ; Steffensen, Mogens.

I: ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA, Bind 43, Nr. 3, 2013, s. 323-357.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Christiansen, M & Steffensen, M 2013, 'Safe-Side Scenarios for Financial and Biometrical Risk', ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA, bind 43, nr. 3, s. 323-357. https://doi.org/10.1017/asb.2013.16

APA

Christiansen, M., & Steffensen, M. (2013). Safe-Side Scenarios for Financial and Biometrical Risk. ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA, 43(3), 323-357. https://doi.org/10.1017/asb.2013.16

Vancouver

Christiansen M, Steffensen M. Safe-Side Scenarios for Financial and Biometrical Risk. ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA. 2013;43(3):323-357. https://doi.org/10.1017/asb.2013.16

Author

Christiansen, Marcus ; Steffensen, Mogens. / Safe-Side Scenarios for Financial and Biometrical Risk. I: ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA. 2013 ; Bind 43, Nr. 3. s. 323-357.

Bibtex

@article{d8c5e0a58fd94873ad1c3d676584a7d5,
title = "Safe-Side Scenarios for Financial and Biometrical Risk",
abstract = "Premium settlement and calculation of reserves and capital requirements are typically based on worst- or just bad-case assumptions on interest rates, mortality rates, and other transition rates between states defined according to the insurance benefits. If interest and transition rates are chosen independently from each other, the worst choice, i.e. the combination of interest rates and transition rates that maximizes the reserve, can be found by dynamic programming. Here, we generalize this idea by choosing the interest and transition rates from a set that allows for mutual dependence. In general, finding the worst case is much more complicated in this situation, but we characterize a set of relatively tractable problems and present a series of examples from this set. Our approach with mutual dependence is relevant e.g. for internal models in Solvency II.",
author = "Marcus Christiansen and Mogens Steffensen",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1017/asb.2013.16",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "323--357",
journal = "ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA",
issn = "0515-0361",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safe-Side Scenarios for Financial and Biometrical Risk

AU - Christiansen, Marcus

AU - Steffensen, Mogens

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Premium settlement and calculation of reserves and capital requirements are typically based on worst- or just bad-case assumptions on interest rates, mortality rates, and other transition rates between states defined according to the insurance benefits. If interest and transition rates are chosen independently from each other, the worst choice, i.e. the combination of interest rates and transition rates that maximizes the reserve, can be found by dynamic programming. Here, we generalize this idea by choosing the interest and transition rates from a set that allows for mutual dependence. In general, finding the worst case is much more complicated in this situation, but we characterize a set of relatively tractable problems and present a series of examples from this set. Our approach with mutual dependence is relevant e.g. for internal models in Solvency II.

AB - Premium settlement and calculation of reserves and capital requirements are typically based on worst- or just bad-case assumptions on interest rates, mortality rates, and other transition rates between states defined according to the insurance benefits. If interest and transition rates are chosen independently from each other, the worst choice, i.e. the combination of interest rates and transition rates that maximizes the reserve, can be found by dynamic programming. Here, we generalize this idea by choosing the interest and transition rates from a set that allows for mutual dependence. In general, finding the worst case is much more complicated in this situation, but we characterize a set of relatively tractable problems and present a series of examples from this set. Our approach with mutual dependence is relevant e.g. for internal models in Solvency II.

U2 - 10.1017/asb.2013.16

DO - 10.1017/asb.2013.16

M3 - Journal article

VL - 43

SP - 323

EP - 357

JO - ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA

JF - ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA

SN - 0515-0361

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 102772997