Limitations of optimization algorithms on noisy quantum devices

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Limitations of optimization algorithms on noisy quantum devices. / Stilck França, Daniel; García-Patrón, Raul.

I: Nature Physics, Bind 17, 2021, s. 1221–1227.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Stilck França, D & García-Patrón, R 2021, 'Limitations of optimization algorithms on noisy quantum devices', Nature Physics, bind 17, s. 1221–1227. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01356-3

APA

Stilck França, D., & García-Patrón, R. (2021). Limitations of optimization algorithms on noisy quantum devices. Nature Physics, 17, 1221–1227. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01356-3

Vancouver

Stilck França D, García-Patrón R. Limitations of optimization algorithms on noisy quantum devices. Nature Physics. 2021;17:1221–1227. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01356-3

Author

Stilck França, Daniel ; García-Patrón, Raul. / Limitations of optimization algorithms on noisy quantum devices. I: Nature Physics. 2021 ; Bind 17. s. 1221–1227.

Bibtex

@article{0e51231784de4c079bca5a60af2a4fe2,
title = "Limitations of optimization algorithms on noisy quantum devices",
abstract = "Recent successes in producing intermediate-scale quantum devices have focused interest on establishing whether near-term devices could outperform classical computers for practical applications. A central question is whether noise can be overcome in the absence of quantum error correction or if it fundamentally restricts any potential quantum advantage. We present a transparent way of comparing classical and quantum algorithms running on noisy devices for a large family of tasks that includes optimization and variational eigenstate solving. Our approach is based on entropic inequalities that determine how fast the quantum state converges to the fixed point of the noise model, together with established classical methods of Gibbs state simulation. Our techniques are extremely versatile and so may be applied to a large variety of algorithms, noise models and quantum computing architectures. We use our result to provide estimates for problems within reach of current experiments, such as quantum annealers or variational quantum algorithms. The bounds we obtain indicate that substantial quantum advantages are unlikely for classical optimization unless noise rates are decreased by orders of magnitude or the topology of the problem matches that of the device. This is the case even if the number of available qubits increases substantially.",
author = "{Stilck Fran{\c c}a}, Daniel and Raul Garc{\'i}a-Patr{\'o}n",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1038/s41567-021-01356-3",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "1221–1227",
journal = "Nature Physics",
issn = "1745-2473",
publisher = "nature publishing group",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Limitations of optimization algorithms on noisy quantum devices

AU - Stilck França, Daniel

AU - García-Patrón, Raul

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Recent successes in producing intermediate-scale quantum devices have focused interest on establishing whether near-term devices could outperform classical computers for practical applications. A central question is whether noise can be overcome in the absence of quantum error correction or if it fundamentally restricts any potential quantum advantage. We present a transparent way of comparing classical and quantum algorithms running on noisy devices for a large family of tasks that includes optimization and variational eigenstate solving. Our approach is based on entropic inequalities that determine how fast the quantum state converges to the fixed point of the noise model, together with established classical methods of Gibbs state simulation. Our techniques are extremely versatile and so may be applied to a large variety of algorithms, noise models and quantum computing architectures. We use our result to provide estimates for problems within reach of current experiments, such as quantum annealers or variational quantum algorithms. The bounds we obtain indicate that substantial quantum advantages are unlikely for classical optimization unless noise rates are decreased by orders of magnitude or the topology of the problem matches that of the device. This is the case even if the number of available qubits increases substantially.

AB - Recent successes in producing intermediate-scale quantum devices have focused interest on establishing whether near-term devices could outperform classical computers for practical applications. A central question is whether noise can be overcome in the absence of quantum error correction or if it fundamentally restricts any potential quantum advantage. We present a transparent way of comparing classical and quantum algorithms running on noisy devices for a large family of tasks that includes optimization and variational eigenstate solving. Our approach is based on entropic inequalities that determine how fast the quantum state converges to the fixed point of the noise model, together with established classical methods of Gibbs state simulation. Our techniques are extremely versatile and so may be applied to a large variety of algorithms, noise models and quantum computing architectures. We use our result to provide estimates for problems within reach of current experiments, such as quantum annealers or variational quantum algorithms. The bounds we obtain indicate that substantial quantum advantages are unlikely for classical optimization unless noise rates are decreased by orders of magnitude or the topology of the problem matches that of the device. This is the case even if the number of available qubits increases substantially.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117476780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41567-021-01356-3

DO - 10.1038/s41567-021-01356-3

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85117476780

VL - 17

SP - 1221

EP - 1227

JO - Nature Physics

JF - Nature Physics

SN - 1745-2473

ER -

ID: 284295860