How different from random are docking predictions when ranked by scoring functions?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

How different from random are docking predictions when ranked by scoring functions? / Feliu, Elisenda; Oliva, Baldomero.

I: Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, Bind 78, Nr. 16, 2010, s. 3376-3385.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Feliu, E & Oliva, B 2010, 'How different from random are docking predictions when ranked by scoring functions?', Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, bind 78, nr. 16, s. 3376-3385. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.22844

APA

Feliu, E., & Oliva, B. (2010). How different from random are docking predictions when ranked by scoring functions? Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 78(16), 3376-3385. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.22844

Vancouver

Feliu E, Oliva B. How different from random are docking predictions when ranked by scoring functions? Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics. 2010;78(16):3376-3385. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.22844

Author

Feliu, Elisenda ; Oliva, Baldomero. / How different from random are docking predictions when ranked by scoring functions?. I: Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics. 2010 ; Bind 78, Nr. 16. s. 3376-3385.

Bibtex

@article{53a704a9efa749dcaf9574f8a75dad44,
title = "How different from random are docking predictions when ranked by scoring functions?",
abstract = "Docking algorithms predict the structure of protein-protein interactions. They sample the orientation of two unbound proteins to produce various predictions about their interactions, followed by a scoring step to rank the predictions. We present a statistical assessment of scoring functions used to rank near-native orientations, applying our statistical analysis to a benchmark dataset of decoys of protein-protein complexes and assessing the statistical significance of the outcome in the Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions (CAPRI) scoring experiment. A P value was assigned that depended on the number of near-native structures in the sampling. We studied the effect of filtering out redundant structures and tested the use of pair-potentials derived using ZDock and ZRank. Our results show that for many targets, it is not possible to determine when a successful reranking performed by scoring functions results merely from random choice. This analysis reveals that changes should be made in the design of the CAPRI scoring experiment. We propose including the statistical assessment in this experiment either at the preprocessing or the evaluation step.",
keywords = "Algorithms, Cluster Analysis, Databases, Protein, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Protein Interaction Mapping, Proteins",
author = "Elisenda Feliu and Baldomero Oliva",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1002/prot.22844",
language = "English",
volume = "78",
pages = "3376--3385",
journal = "Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics",
issn = "0887-3585",
publisher = "JohnWiley & Sons, Inc.",
number = "16",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How different from random are docking predictions when ranked by scoring functions?

AU - Feliu, Elisenda

AU - Oliva, Baldomero

N1 - Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Docking algorithms predict the structure of protein-protein interactions. They sample the orientation of two unbound proteins to produce various predictions about their interactions, followed by a scoring step to rank the predictions. We present a statistical assessment of scoring functions used to rank near-native orientations, applying our statistical analysis to a benchmark dataset of decoys of protein-protein complexes and assessing the statistical significance of the outcome in the Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions (CAPRI) scoring experiment. A P value was assigned that depended on the number of near-native structures in the sampling. We studied the effect of filtering out redundant structures and tested the use of pair-potentials derived using ZDock and ZRank. Our results show that for many targets, it is not possible to determine when a successful reranking performed by scoring functions results merely from random choice. This analysis reveals that changes should be made in the design of the CAPRI scoring experiment. We propose including the statistical assessment in this experiment either at the preprocessing or the evaluation step.

AB - Docking algorithms predict the structure of protein-protein interactions. They sample the orientation of two unbound proteins to produce various predictions about their interactions, followed by a scoring step to rank the predictions. We present a statistical assessment of scoring functions used to rank near-native orientations, applying our statistical analysis to a benchmark dataset of decoys of protein-protein complexes and assessing the statistical significance of the outcome in the Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions (CAPRI) scoring experiment. A P value was assigned that depended on the number of near-native structures in the sampling. We studied the effect of filtering out redundant structures and tested the use of pair-potentials derived using ZDock and ZRank. Our results show that for many targets, it is not possible to determine when a successful reranking performed by scoring functions results merely from random choice. This analysis reveals that changes should be made in the design of the CAPRI scoring experiment. We propose including the statistical assessment in this experiment either at the preprocessing or the evaluation step.

KW - Algorithms

KW - Cluster Analysis

KW - Databases, Protein

KW - Models, Molecular

KW - Protein Binding

KW - Protein Conformation

KW - Protein Interaction Mapping

KW - Proteins

U2 - 10.1002/prot.22844

DO - 10.1002/prot.22844

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 20848549

VL - 78

SP - 3376

EP - 3385

JO - Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics

JF - Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics

SN - 0887-3585

IS - 16

ER -

ID: 40285347