A Two-Account Life Insurance Model for Scenario-Based Valuation Including Event Risk

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

A Two-Account Life Insurance Model for Scenario-Based Valuation Including Event Risk. / Jensen, Ninna Reitzel; Schomacker, Kristian Juul.

I: Risks, Bind 3, Nr. 2, 2015, s. 183-218.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Jensen, NR & Schomacker, KJ 2015, 'A Two-Account Life Insurance Model for Scenario-Based Valuation Including Event Risk', Risks, bind 3, nr. 2, s. 183-218. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks3020183

APA

Jensen, N. R., & Schomacker, K. J. (2015). A Two-Account Life Insurance Model for Scenario-Based Valuation Including Event Risk. Risks, 3(2), 183-218. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks3020183

Vancouver

Jensen NR, Schomacker KJ. A Two-Account Life Insurance Model for Scenario-Based Valuation Including Event Risk. Risks. 2015;3(2):183-218. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks3020183

Author

Jensen, Ninna Reitzel ; Schomacker, Kristian Juul. / A Two-Account Life Insurance Model for Scenario-Based Valuation Including Event Risk. I: Risks. 2015 ; Bind 3, Nr. 2. s. 183-218.

Bibtex

@article{071c83fd772a4de1ae251deca45a60c3,
title = "A Two-Account Life Insurance Model for Scenario-Based Valuation Including Event Risk",
abstract = "Using a two-account model with event risk, we model life insurance contracts taking into account both guaranteed and non-guaranteed payments in participating life insurance as well as in unit-linked insurance. Here, event risk is used as a generic term for life insurance events, such as death, disability, etc. In our treatment of participating life insurance, we have special focus on the bonus schemes “consolidation” and “additional benefits”, and one goal is to formalize how these work and interact. Another goal is to describe similarities and differences between participating life insurance and unit-linked insurance. By use of a two-account model, we are able to illustrate general concepts without making the model too abstract. To allow for complicated financial markets without dramatically increasing the mathematical complexity, we focus on economic scenarios. We illustrate the use of our model by conducting scenario analysis based on Monte Carlo simulation, but the model applies to scenarios in general and to worst-case and best-estimate scenarios in particular. In addition to easy computations, our model offers a common framework for the valuation of life insurance payments across product types. This enables comparison of participating life insurance products and unit-linked insurance products, thus building a bridge between the two different ways of formalizing life insurance products. Finally, our model distinguishes itself from the existing literature by taking into account the Markov model for the state of the policyholder and, hereby, facilitating event risk. ",
author = "Jensen, {Ninna Reitzel} and Schomacker, {Kristian Juul}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.3390/risks3020183",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "183--218",
journal = "Risks",
issn = "2227-9091",
publisher = "MDPI",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Two-Account Life Insurance Model for Scenario-Based Valuation Including Event Risk

AU - Jensen, Ninna Reitzel

AU - Schomacker, Kristian Juul

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Using a two-account model with event risk, we model life insurance contracts taking into account both guaranteed and non-guaranteed payments in participating life insurance as well as in unit-linked insurance. Here, event risk is used as a generic term for life insurance events, such as death, disability, etc. In our treatment of participating life insurance, we have special focus on the bonus schemes “consolidation” and “additional benefits”, and one goal is to formalize how these work and interact. Another goal is to describe similarities and differences between participating life insurance and unit-linked insurance. By use of a two-account model, we are able to illustrate general concepts without making the model too abstract. To allow for complicated financial markets without dramatically increasing the mathematical complexity, we focus on economic scenarios. We illustrate the use of our model by conducting scenario analysis based on Monte Carlo simulation, but the model applies to scenarios in general and to worst-case and best-estimate scenarios in particular. In addition to easy computations, our model offers a common framework for the valuation of life insurance payments across product types. This enables comparison of participating life insurance products and unit-linked insurance products, thus building a bridge between the two different ways of formalizing life insurance products. Finally, our model distinguishes itself from the existing literature by taking into account the Markov model for the state of the policyholder and, hereby, facilitating event risk.

AB - Using a two-account model with event risk, we model life insurance contracts taking into account both guaranteed and non-guaranteed payments in participating life insurance as well as in unit-linked insurance. Here, event risk is used as a generic term for life insurance events, such as death, disability, etc. In our treatment of participating life insurance, we have special focus on the bonus schemes “consolidation” and “additional benefits”, and one goal is to formalize how these work and interact. Another goal is to describe similarities and differences between participating life insurance and unit-linked insurance. By use of a two-account model, we are able to illustrate general concepts without making the model too abstract. To allow for complicated financial markets without dramatically increasing the mathematical complexity, we focus on economic scenarios. We illustrate the use of our model by conducting scenario analysis based on Monte Carlo simulation, but the model applies to scenarios in general and to worst-case and best-estimate scenarios in particular. In addition to easy computations, our model offers a common framework for the valuation of life insurance payments across product types. This enables comparison of participating life insurance products and unit-linked insurance products, thus building a bridge between the two different ways of formalizing life insurance products. Finally, our model distinguishes itself from the existing literature by taking into account the Markov model for the state of the policyholder and, hereby, facilitating event risk.

UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/3/2/183

U2 - 10.3390/risks3020183

DO - 10.3390/risks3020183

M3 - Journal article

VL - 3

SP - 183

EP - 218

JO - Risks

JF - Risks

SN - 2227-9091

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 148513705