Quantum Differential Privacy: An Information Theory Perspective

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Quantum Differential Privacy : An Information Theory Perspective. / Hirche, Christoph; Rouze, Cambyse; Franca, Daniel Stilck.

In: IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Vol. 69, No. 9, 2023, p. 5771-5787.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hirche, C, Rouze, C & Franca, DS 2023, 'Quantum Differential Privacy: An Information Theory Perspective', IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 5771-5787. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2023.3272904

APA

Hirche, C., Rouze, C., & Franca, D. S. (2023). Quantum Differential Privacy: An Information Theory Perspective. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 69(9), 5771-5787. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2023.3272904

Vancouver

Hirche C, Rouze C, Franca DS. Quantum Differential Privacy: An Information Theory Perspective. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. 2023;69(9):5771-5787. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2023.3272904

Author

Hirche, Christoph ; Rouze, Cambyse ; Franca, Daniel Stilck. / Quantum Differential Privacy : An Information Theory Perspective. In: IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. 2023 ; Vol. 69, No. 9. pp. 5771-5787.

Bibtex

@article{a2ac555866b74adfa19f5bef6112a99e,
title = "Quantum Differential Privacy: An Information Theory Perspective",
abstract = "Differential privacy has been an exceptionally successful concept when it comes to providing provable security guarantees for classical computations. More recently, the concept was generalized to quantum computations. While classical computations are essentially noiseless and differential privacy is often achieved by artificially adding noise, near-term quantum computers are inherently noisy and it was observed that this leads to natural differential privacy as a feature. In this work we discuss quantum differential privacy in an information theoretic framework by casting it as a quantum divergence. A main advantage of this approach is that differential privacy becomes a property solely based on the output states of the computation, without the need to check it for every measurement. This leads to simpler proofs and generalized statements of its properties as well as several new bounds for both, general and specific, noise models. In particular, these include common representations of quantum circuits and quantum machine learning concepts. Here, we focus on the difference in the amount of noise required to achieve certain levels of differential privacy versus the amount that would make any computation useless. Finally, we also generalize the classical concepts of local differential privacy, R{\'e}nyi differential privacy and the hypothesis testing interpretation to the quantum setting, providing several new properties and insights.",
keywords = "Computational modeling, Differential privacy, Machine learning, Privacy, Quantum computing, Quantum mechanics, Quantum state",
author = "Christoph Hirche and Cambyse Rouze and Franca, {Daniel Stilck}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: IEEE",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1109/TIT.2023.3272904",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
pages = "5771--5787",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Information Theory",
issn = "0018-9448",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantum Differential Privacy

T2 - An Information Theory Perspective

AU - Hirche, Christoph

AU - Rouze, Cambyse

AU - Franca, Daniel Stilck

N1 - Publisher Copyright: IEEE

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Differential privacy has been an exceptionally successful concept when it comes to providing provable security guarantees for classical computations. More recently, the concept was generalized to quantum computations. While classical computations are essentially noiseless and differential privacy is often achieved by artificially adding noise, near-term quantum computers are inherently noisy and it was observed that this leads to natural differential privacy as a feature. In this work we discuss quantum differential privacy in an information theoretic framework by casting it as a quantum divergence. A main advantage of this approach is that differential privacy becomes a property solely based on the output states of the computation, without the need to check it for every measurement. This leads to simpler proofs and generalized statements of its properties as well as several new bounds for both, general and specific, noise models. In particular, these include common representations of quantum circuits and quantum machine learning concepts. Here, we focus on the difference in the amount of noise required to achieve certain levels of differential privacy versus the amount that would make any computation useless. Finally, we also generalize the classical concepts of local differential privacy, Rényi differential privacy and the hypothesis testing interpretation to the quantum setting, providing several new properties and insights.

AB - Differential privacy has been an exceptionally successful concept when it comes to providing provable security guarantees for classical computations. More recently, the concept was generalized to quantum computations. While classical computations are essentially noiseless and differential privacy is often achieved by artificially adding noise, near-term quantum computers are inherently noisy and it was observed that this leads to natural differential privacy as a feature. In this work we discuss quantum differential privacy in an information theoretic framework by casting it as a quantum divergence. A main advantage of this approach is that differential privacy becomes a property solely based on the output states of the computation, without the need to check it for every measurement. This leads to simpler proofs and generalized statements of its properties as well as several new bounds for both, general and specific, noise models. In particular, these include common representations of quantum circuits and quantum machine learning concepts. Here, we focus on the difference in the amount of noise required to achieve certain levels of differential privacy versus the amount that would make any computation useless. Finally, we also generalize the classical concepts of local differential privacy, Rényi differential privacy and the hypothesis testing interpretation to the quantum setting, providing several new properties and insights.

KW - Computational modeling

KW - Differential privacy

KW - Machine learning

KW - Privacy

KW - Quantum computing

KW - Quantum mechanics

KW - Quantum state

U2 - 10.1109/TIT.2023.3272904

DO - 10.1109/TIT.2023.3272904

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85159801876

VL - 69

SP - 5771

EP - 5787

JO - IEEE Transactions on Information Theory

JF - IEEE Transactions on Information Theory

SN - 0018-9448

IS - 9

ER -

ID: 358723339