Capturing spike variability in noisy Izhikevich neurons using point process generalized linear models

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Capturing spike variability in noisy Izhikevich neurons using point process generalized linear models. / Østergaard, Jacob; Kramer, Mark A.; Eden, Uri T.

In: Neural Computation, Vol. 30, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 125-148.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Østergaard, J, Kramer, MA & Eden, UT 2018, 'Capturing spike variability in noisy Izhikevich neurons using point process generalized linear models', Neural Computation, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 125-148. https://doi.org/10.1162/NECO_a_01030

APA

Østergaard, J., Kramer, M. A., & Eden, U. T. (2018). Capturing spike variability in noisy Izhikevich neurons using point process generalized linear models. Neural Computation, 30(1), 125-148. https://doi.org/10.1162/NECO_a_01030

Vancouver

Østergaard J, Kramer MA, Eden UT. Capturing spike variability in noisy Izhikevich neurons using point process generalized linear models. Neural Computation. 2018 Jan 1;30(1):125-148. https://doi.org/10.1162/NECO_a_01030

Author

Østergaard, Jacob ; Kramer, Mark A. ; Eden, Uri T. / Capturing spike variability in noisy Izhikevich neurons using point process generalized linear models. In: Neural Computation. 2018 ; Vol. 30, No. 1. pp. 125-148.

Bibtex

@article{59b5ba9050bd4c7e9892fddc0e3106f8,
title = "Capturing spike variability in noisy Izhikevich neurons using point process generalized linear models",
abstract = "To understand neural activity, two broad categories of models exist: statistical and dynamical.While statistical models possess rigorous methods for parameter estimation and goodness-of-fit assessment, dynamical models provide mechanistic insight. In general, these two categories of models are separately applied; understanding the relationships between these modeling approaches remains an area of active research. In this letter, we examine this relationship using simulation. To do so, we first generate spike train data from a well-known dynamical model, the Izhikevich neuron, with a noisy input current. We then fit these spike train datawith a statistical model (a generalized linear model, GLM, with multiplicative influences of past spiking). For different levels of noise, we show how the GLM captures both the deterministic features of the Izhikevich neuron and the variability driven by the noise. We conclude that the GLM captures essential features of the simulated spike trains, but for near-deterministic spike trains, goodness-of-fit analyses reveal that the model does not fit very well in a statistical sense; the essential random part of the GLM is not captured.",
author = "Jacob {\O}stergaard and Kramer, {Mark A.} and Eden, {Uri T.}",
year = "2018",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1162/NECO_a_01030",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "125--148",
journal = "Neural Computation",
issn = "0899-7667",
publisher = "M I T Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Capturing spike variability in noisy Izhikevich neurons using point process generalized linear models

AU - Østergaard, Jacob

AU - Kramer, Mark A.

AU - Eden, Uri T.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - To understand neural activity, two broad categories of models exist: statistical and dynamical.While statistical models possess rigorous methods for parameter estimation and goodness-of-fit assessment, dynamical models provide mechanistic insight. In general, these two categories of models are separately applied; understanding the relationships between these modeling approaches remains an area of active research. In this letter, we examine this relationship using simulation. To do so, we first generate spike train data from a well-known dynamical model, the Izhikevich neuron, with a noisy input current. We then fit these spike train datawith a statistical model (a generalized linear model, GLM, with multiplicative influences of past spiking). For different levels of noise, we show how the GLM captures both the deterministic features of the Izhikevich neuron and the variability driven by the noise. We conclude that the GLM captures essential features of the simulated spike trains, but for near-deterministic spike trains, goodness-of-fit analyses reveal that the model does not fit very well in a statistical sense; the essential random part of the GLM is not captured.

AB - To understand neural activity, two broad categories of models exist: statistical and dynamical.While statistical models possess rigorous methods for parameter estimation and goodness-of-fit assessment, dynamical models provide mechanistic insight. In general, these two categories of models are separately applied; understanding the relationships between these modeling approaches remains an area of active research. In this letter, we examine this relationship using simulation. To do so, we first generate spike train data from a well-known dynamical model, the Izhikevich neuron, with a noisy input current. We then fit these spike train datawith a statistical model (a generalized linear model, GLM, with multiplicative influences of past spiking). For different levels of noise, we show how the GLM captures both the deterministic features of the Izhikevich neuron and the variability driven by the noise. We conclude that the GLM captures essential features of the simulated spike trains, but for near-deterministic spike trains, goodness-of-fit analyses reveal that the model does not fit very well in a statistical sense; the essential random part of the GLM is not captured.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038214740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1162/NECO_a_01030

DO - 10.1162/NECO_a_01030

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85038214740

VL - 30

SP - 125

EP - 148

JO - Neural Computation

JF - Neural Computation

SN - 0899-7667

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 195225483