An operational environment for quantum self-testing

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

An operational environment for quantum self-testing. / Christandl, Matthias; Larsen, Nicholas Gauguin Houghton; Mancinska, Laura.

In: Quantum, Vol. 6, 699, 2022, p. 1-67.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Christandl, M, Larsen, NGH & Mancinska, L 2022, 'An operational environment for quantum self-testing', Quantum, vol. 6, 699, pp. 1-67. https://doi.org/10.22331/Q-2022-04-27-699

APA

Christandl, M., Larsen, N. G. H., & Mancinska, L. (2022). An operational environment for quantum self-testing. Quantum, 6, 1-67. [699]. https://doi.org/10.22331/Q-2022-04-27-699

Vancouver

Christandl M, Larsen NGH, Mancinska L. An operational environment for quantum self-testing. Quantum. 2022;6:1-67. 699. https://doi.org/10.22331/Q-2022-04-27-699

Author

Christandl, Matthias ; Larsen, Nicholas Gauguin Houghton ; Mancinska, Laura. / An operational environment for quantum self-testing. In: Quantum. 2022 ; Vol. 6. pp. 1-67.

Bibtex

@article{11029781a59b455a80a2f4c07920106b,
title = "An operational environment for quantum self-testing",
abstract = "Observed quantum correlations are known to determine in certain cases the underlying quantum state and measurements. This phenomenon is known as (quantum) self-testing. Self-testing constitutes a significant research area with practical and theoretical ramifications for quantum information theory. But since its conception two decades ago by Mayers and Yao, the common way to rigorously formulate self-testing has been in terms of operator-algebraic identities, and this formulation lacks an operational interpretation. In particular, it is unclear how to formulate self-testing in other physical theories, in formulations of quantum theory not referring to operator-algebra, or in scenarios causally different from the standard one. In this paper, we explain how to understand quantum self-testing operationally, in terms of causally structured dilations of the input-output channel encoding the correlations. These dilations model side-information which leaks to an environment according to a specific schedule, and we show how self-testing concerns the relative strength between such scheduled leaks of information. As such, the title of our paper has double meaning: we recast conventional quantum self-testing in terms of information-leaks to an environment — and this realises quantum self-testing as a special case within the surroundings of a general operational framework. Our new approach to quantum self-testing not only supplies an operational understanding apt for various generalisations, but also resolves some unexplained aspects of the existing definition, naturally suggests a distance measure suitable for robust self-testing, and points towards self-testing as a modular concept in a larger, cryptographic perspective.",
author = "Matthias Christandl and Larsen, {Nicholas Gauguin Houghton} and Laura Mancinska",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 Verein zur Forderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften. All Rights Reserved.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.22331/Q-2022-04-27-699",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "1--67",
journal = "Quantum",
issn = "2521-327X",
publisher = "Verein zur F{\"o}rderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - An operational environment for quantum self-testing

AU - Christandl, Matthias

AU - Larsen, Nicholas Gauguin Houghton

AU - Mancinska, Laura

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Verein zur Forderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften. All Rights Reserved.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Observed quantum correlations are known to determine in certain cases the underlying quantum state and measurements. This phenomenon is known as (quantum) self-testing. Self-testing constitutes a significant research area with practical and theoretical ramifications for quantum information theory. But since its conception two decades ago by Mayers and Yao, the common way to rigorously formulate self-testing has been in terms of operator-algebraic identities, and this formulation lacks an operational interpretation. In particular, it is unclear how to formulate self-testing in other physical theories, in formulations of quantum theory not referring to operator-algebra, or in scenarios causally different from the standard one. In this paper, we explain how to understand quantum self-testing operationally, in terms of causally structured dilations of the input-output channel encoding the correlations. These dilations model side-information which leaks to an environment according to a specific schedule, and we show how self-testing concerns the relative strength between such scheduled leaks of information. As such, the title of our paper has double meaning: we recast conventional quantum self-testing in terms of information-leaks to an environment — and this realises quantum self-testing as a special case within the surroundings of a general operational framework. Our new approach to quantum self-testing not only supplies an operational understanding apt for various generalisations, but also resolves some unexplained aspects of the existing definition, naturally suggests a distance measure suitable for robust self-testing, and points towards self-testing as a modular concept in a larger, cryptographic perspective.

AB - Observed quantum correlations are known to determine in certain cases the underlying quantum state and measurements. This phenomenon is known as (quantum) self-testing. Self-testing constitutes a significant research area with practical and theoretical ramifications for quantum information theory. But since its conception two decades ago by Mayers and Yao, the common way to rigorously formulate self-testing has been in terms of operator-algebraic identities, and this formulation lacks an operational interpretation. In particular, it is unclear how to formulate self-testing in other physical theories, in formulations of quantum theory not referring to operator-algebra, or in scenarios causally different from the standard one. In this paper, we explain how to understand quantum self-testing operationally, in terms of causally structured dilations of the input-output channel encoding the correlations. These dilations model side-information which leaks to an environment according to a specific schedule, and we show how self-testing concerns the relative strength between such scheduled leaks of information. As such, the title of our paper has double meaning: we recast conventional quantum self-testing in terms of information-leaks to an environment — and this realises quantum self-testing as a special case within the surroundings of a general operational framework. Our new approach to quantum self-testing not only supplies an operational understanding apt for various generalisations, but also resolves some unexplained aspects of the existing definition, naturally suggests a distance measure suitable for robust self-testing, and points towards self-testing as a modular concept in a larger, cryptographic perspective.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132679111&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.22331/Q-2022-04-27-699

DO - 10.22331/Q-2022-04-27-699

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85132679111

VL - 6

SP - 1

EP - 67

JO - Quantum

JF - Quantum

SN - 2521-327X

M1 - 699

ER -

ID: 312622080