Statistical model selection methods applied to biological networks

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

Standard

Statistical model selection methods applied to biological networks. / Stumpf, Michael P H; Ingram, Piers J.; Nouvel, Ian; Wiuf, Carsten.

Transactions on Computational systems Biology III. 2005. p. 65-77 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Vol. 3737 LNBI).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Stumpf, MPH, Ingram, PJ, Nouvel, I & Wiuf, C 2005, Statistical model selection methods applied to biological networks. in Transactions on Computational systems Biology III. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 3737 LNBI, pp. 65-77.

APA

Stumpf, M. P. H., Ingram, P. J., Nouvel, I., & Wiuf, C. (2005). Statistical model selection methods applied to biological networks. In Transactions on Computational systems Biology III (pp. 65-77). Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) Vol. 3737 LNBI

Vancouver

Stumpf MPH, Ingram PJ, Nouvel I, Wiuf C. Statistical model selection methods applied to biological networks. In Transactions on Computational systems Biology III. 2005. p. 65-77. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Vol. 3737 LNBI).

Author

Stumpf, Michael P H ; Ingram, Piers J. ; Nouvel, Ian ; Wiuf, Carsten. / Statistical model selection methods applied to biological networks. Transactions on Computational systems Biology III. 2005. pp. 65-77 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Vol. 3737 LNBI).

Bibtex

@inproceedings{a123c876314c439b8642ba01f91b393a,
title = "Statistical model selection methods applied to biological networks",
abstract = "Many biological networks have been labelled scale-free as their degree distribution can be approximately described by a powerlaw distribution. While the degree distribution does not summarize all aspects of a network it has often been suggested that its functional form contains important clues as to underlying evolutionary processes that have shaped the network. Generally determining the appropriate functional form for the degree distribution has been fitted in an ad-hoc fashion. Here we apply formal statistical model selection methods to determine which functional form best describes degree distributions of protein interaction and metabolic networks. We interpret the degree distribution as belonging to a class of probability models and determine which of these models provides the best description for the empirical data using maximum likelihood inference, composite likelihood methods, the Akaike information criterion and goodness-of-fit tests. The whole data is used in order to determine the parameter that best explains the data under a given model (e.g. scale-free or random graph). As we will show, present protein interaction and metabolic network data from different organisms suggests that simple scale-free models do not provide an adequate description of real network data.",
author = "Stumpf, {Michael P H} and Ingram, {Piers J.} and Ian Nouvel and Carsten Wiuf",
year = "2005",
month = dec,
day = "1",
language = "English",
isbn = "3540308830",
series = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "65--77",
booktitle = "Transactions on Computational systems Biology III",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Statistical model selection methods applied to biological networks

AU - Stumpf, Michael P H

AU - Ingram, Piers J.

AU - Nouvel, Ian

AU - Wiuf, Carsten

PY - 2005/12/1

Y1 - 2005/12/1

N2 - Many biological networks have been labelled scale-free as their degree distribution can be approximately described by a powerlaw distribution. While the degree distribution does not summarize all aspects of a network it has often been suggested that its functional form contains important clues as to underlying evolutionary processes that have shaped the network. Generally determining the appropriate functional form for the degree distribution has been fitted in an ad-hoc fashion. Here we apply formal statistical model selection methods to determine which functional form best describes degree distributions of protein interaction and metabolic networks. We interpret the degree distribution as belonging to a class of probability models and determine which of these models provides the best description for the empirical data using maximum likelihood inference, composite likelihood methods, the Akaike information criterion and goodness-of-fit tests. The whole data is used in order to determine the parameter that best explains the data under a given model (e.g. scale-free or random graph). As we will show, present protein interaction and metabolic network data from different organisms suggests that simple scale-free models do not provide an adequate description of real network data.

AB - Many biological networks have been labelled scale-free as their degree distribution can be approximately described by a powerlaw distribution. While the degree distribution does not summarize all aspects of a network it has often been suggested that its functional form contains important clues as to underlying evolutionary processes that have shaped the network. Generally determining the appropriate functional form for the degree distribution has been fitted in an ad-hoc fashion. Here we apply formal statistical model selection methods to determine which functional form best describes degree distributions of protein interaction and metabolic networks. We interpret the degree distribution as belonging to a class of probability models and determine which of these models provides the best description for the empirical data using maximum likelihood inference, composite likelihood methods, the Akaike information criterion and goodness-of-fit tests. The whole data is used in order to determine the parameter that best explains the data under a given model (e.g. scale-free or random graph). As we will show, present protein interaction and metabolic network data from different organisms suggests that simple scale-free models do not provide an adequate description of real network data.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37149055075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article in proceedings

AN - SCOPUS:37149055075

SN - 3540308830

SN - 9783540308836

T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

SP - 65

EP - 77

BT - Transactions on Computational systems Biology III

ER -

ID: 203902823