Impact assessment revisited: improving the theoretical basis for management of invasive alien species

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Impact assessment revisited : improving the theoretical basis for management of invasive alien species. / Thiele, Jan; Kollmann, Johannes Christian; Markussen, Bo; Otte, Annette.

I: Biological Invasions, Bind 12, Nr. 7, 2010, s. 2025-2035.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Thiele, J, Kollmann, JC, Markussen, B & Otte, A 2010, 'Impact assessment revisited: improving the theoretical basis for management of invasive alien species', Biological Invasions, bind 12, nr. 7, s. 2025-2035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9605-2

APA

Thiele, J., Kollmann, J. C., Markussen, B., & Otte, A. (2010). Impact assessment revisited: improving the theoretical basis for management of invasive alien species. Biological Invasions, 12(7), 2025-2035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9605-2

Vancouver

Thiele J, Kollmann JC, Markussen B, Otte A. Impact assessment revisited: improving the theoretical basis for management of invasive alien species. Biological Invasions. 2010;12(7):2025-2035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9605-2

Author

Thiele, Jan ; Kollmann, Johannes Christian ; Markussen, Bo ; Otte, Annette. / Impact assessment revisited : improving the theoretical basis for management of invasive alien species. I: Biological Invasions. 2010 ; Bind 12, Nr. 7. s. 2025-2035.

Bibtex

@article{a80dd4e0327711df8ed1000ea68e967b,
title = "Impact assessment revisited: improving the theoretical basis for management of invasive alien species",
abstract = "The theoretical underpinnings of the assessment of invasive alien species impacts need to be improved. At present most approaches are unreliable to quantify impact at regional scales and do not allow for comparison of different invasive species. There are four basic problems that need to be addressed: (1) Some impacted ecosystem traits are spatially not additive; (2) invader effects may increase non-linearly with abundance or there may be effect thresholds impairing estimates of linear impact models; (3) the abundance and impact of alien species will often co-vary with environmental variation; and (4) the total invaded range is an inappropriate measure for quantifying regional impact because the habitat area available for invasion can vary markedly among invasive species. Mathematical models and empirical data using an invasive alien plant species (Heracleum mantegazzianum) indicate that ignoring these issues leads to impact estimates almost an order of magnitude from the real values. Thus, we propose a habitatsensitive formula for regional impact assessment that is unaffected by non-linearity. Furthermore, we make some statistical suggestions on how to assess invader effects properly and we discuss the quantification of the invaded range. These improvements are crucial for impact assessment with the overall aim of prioritizing management of invasive species.",
author = "Jan Thiele and Kollmann, {Johannes Christian} and Bo Markussen and Annette Otte",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1007/s10530-009-9605-2",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "2025--2035",
journal = "Biological Invasions",
issn = "1387-3547",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact assessment revisited

T2 - improving the theoretical basis for management of invasive alien species

AU - Thiele, Jan

AU - Kollmann, Johannes Christian

AU - Markussen, Bo

AU - Otte, Annette

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The theoretical underpinnings of the assessment of invasive alien species impacts need to be improved. At present most approaches are unreliable to quantify impact at regional scales and do not allow for comparison of different invasive species. There are four basic problems that need to be addressed: (1) Some impacted ecosystem traits are spatially not additive; (2) invader effects may increase non-linearly with abundance or there may be effect thresholds impairing estimates of linear impact models; (3) the abundance and impact of alien species will often co-vary with environmental variation; and (4) the total invaded range is an inappropriate measure for quantifying regional impact because the habitat area available for invasion can vary markedly among invasive species. Mathematical models and empirical data using an invasive alien plant species (Heracleum mantegazzianum) indicate that ignoring these issues leads to impact estimates almost an order of magnitude from the real values. Thus, we propose a habitatsensitive formula for regional impact assessment that is unaffected by non-linearity. Furthermore, we make some statistical suggestions on how to assess invader effects properly and we discuss the quantification of the invaded range. These improvements are crucial for impact assessment with the overall aim of prioritizing management of invasive species.

AB - The theoretical underpinnings of the assessment of invasive alien species impacts need to be improved. At present most approaches are unreliable to quantify impact at regional scales and do not allow for comparison of different invasive species. There are four basic problems that need to be addressed: (1) Some impacted ecosystem traits are spatially not additive; (2) invader effects may increase non-linearly with abundance or there may be effect thresholds impairing estimates of linear impact models; (3) the abundance and impact of alien species will often co-vary with environmental variation; and (4) the total invaded range is an inappropriate measure for quantifying regional impact because the habitat area available for invasion can vary markedly among invasive species. Mathematical models and empirical data using an invasive alien plant species (Heracleum mantegazzianum) indicate that ignoring these issues leads to impact estimates almost an order of magnitude from the real values. Thus, we propose a habitatsensitive formula for regional impact assessment that is unaffected by non-linearity. Furthermore, we make some statistical suggestions on how to assess invader effects properly and we discuss the quantification of the invaded range. These improvements are crucial for impact assessment with the overall aim of prioritizing management of invasive species.

U2 - 10.1007/s10530-009-9605-2

DO - 10.1007/s10530-009-9605-2

M3 - Journal article

VL - 12

SP - 2025

EP - 2035

JO - Biological Invasions

JF - Biological Invasions

SN - 1387-3547

IS - 7

ER -

ID: 18691540