Modelling the impact of reducing control measures on the COVID-19 pandemic in a low transmission setting

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Modelling the impact of reducing control measures on the COVID-19 pandemic in a low transmission setting. / Scott, Nick; Palmer, Anna; Delport, Dominic; Abeysuriya, Romesh; Stuart, Robyn Margaret; Kerr, Cliff C; Mistry, Dina ; Klein, Daniel; Sacks-Davis, Rachel ; Heath, Katie; Hainsworth, Samuel ; Pedrana, Alisa ; Stoove, Mark ; Wilson, David ; Hellard, Margaret E .

I: Medical Journal of Australia, 2020.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Scott, N, Palmer, A, Delport, D, Abeysuriya, R, Stuart, RM, Kerr, CC, Mistry, D, Klein, D, Sacks-Davis, R, Heath, K, Hainsworth, S, Pedrana, A, Stoove, M, Wilson, D & Hellard, ME 2020, 'Modelling the impact of reducing control measures on the COVID-19 pandemic in a low transmission setting', Medical Journal of Australia. <https://www.mja.com.au/system/files/2020-09/Scott%20mja20.01138%20-%202%20September%202020_0.pdf>

APA

Scott, N., Palmer, A., Delport, D., Abeysuriya, R., Stuart, R. M., Kerr, C. C., Mistry, D., Klein, D., Sacks-Davis, R., Heath, K., Hainsworth, S., Pedrana, A., Stoove, M., Wilson, D., & Hellard, M. E. (Accepteret/In press). Modelling the impact of reducing control measures on the COVID-19 pandemic in a low transmission setting. Medical Journal of Australia. https://www.mja.com.au/system/files/2020-09/Scott%20mja20.01138%20-%202%20September%202020_0.pdf

Vancouver

Scott N, Palmer A, Delport D, Abeysuriya R, Stuart RM, Kerr CC o.a. Modelling the impact of reducing control measures on the COVID-19 pandemic in a low transmission setting. Medical Journal of Australia. 2020.

Author

Scott, Nick ; Palmer, Anna ; Delport, Dominic ; Abeysuriya, Romesh ; Stuart, Robyn Margaret ; Kerr, Cliff C ; Mistry, Dina ; Klein, Daniel ; Sacks-Davis, Rachel ; Heath, Katie ; Hainsworth, Samuel ; Pedrana, Alisa ; Stoove, Mark ; Wilson, David ; Hellard, Margaret E . / Modelling the impact of reducing control measures on the COVID-19 pandemic in a low transmission setting. I: Medical Journal of Australia. 2020.

Bibtex

@article{93e573ba525e439f8e7b2fb588ac5ca1,
title = "Modelling the impact of reducing control measures on the COVID-19 pandemic in a low transmission setting",
abstract = "Objectives: We assessed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic risks associated with relaxing a set of physical distancing restrictions.Design: An agent-based model, Covasim, was used to simulate network-based transmission risks in households, schools, workplaces, and a variety of community spaces (e.g. public transport, parks, bars, cafes/restaurants) and activities (e.g. community or professional sports, large events). Setting: The model was calibrated to the COVID-19 epidemiological and policy environment in Victoria, Australia, between March and May 2020, at a time when there was low community transmission.Participants: Model-simulated Victorian population.Intervention: From May 2020, policy changes to ease restrictions were simulated (e.g. opening/closing businesses) in the context of interventions that included testing, contact tracing (including via a smartphone app), and quarantine.Main outcome measure: Simulated epidemic rebound following relaxation of restrictions.Results: Policy changes leading to the gathering of large, unstructured groups with unknown individuals (e.g. bars opening, increased public transport use) posed the greatest risk of epidemic rebound, while policy changes leading to smaller, structured gatherings with known individuals (e.g. small social gatherings) posed least risk of epidemic rebound. In the model, epidemic rebound following some policy changes took more than two months to occur. Model outcomes support continuation of working from home policies to reduce public transport use, and risk mitigation strategies in the context of social venues opening. Conclusions: Care should be taken to avoid lifting sequential COVID-19 policy restrictions within short time periods, as it could take more than two months to detect the consequences of any changes.",
author = "Nick Scott and Anna Palmer and Dominic Delport and Romesh Abeysuriya and Stuart, {Robyn Margaret} and Kerr, {Cliff C} and Dina Mistry and Daniel Klein and Rachel Sacks-Davis and Katie Heath and Samuel Hainsworth and Alisa Pedrana and Mark Stoove and David Wilson and Hellard, {Margaret E}",
year = "2020",
language = "English",
journal = "Medical Journal of Australia",
issn = "0025-729X",
publisher = "Australasian Medical Publishing Company Pty. Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modelling the impact of reducing control measures on the COVID-19 pandemic in a low transmission setting

AU - Scott, Nick

AU - Palmer, Anna

AU - Delport, Dominic

AU - Abeysuriya, Romesh

AU - Stuart, Robyn Margaret

AU - Kerr, Cliff C

AU - Mistry, Dina

AU - Klein, Daniel

AU - Sacks-Davis, Rachel

AU - Heath, Katie

AU - Hainsworth, Samuel

AU - Pedrana, Alisa

AU - Stoove, Mark

AU - Wilson, David

AU - Hellard, Margaret E

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Objectives: We assessed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic risks associated with relaxing a set of physical distancing restrictions.Design: An agent-based model, Covasim, was used to simulate network-based transmission risks in households, schools, workplaces, and a variety of community spaces (e.g. public transport, parks, bars, cafes/restaurants) and activities (e.g. community or professional sports, large events). Setting: The model was calibrated to the COVID-19 epidemiological and policy environment in Victoria, Australia, between March and May 2020, at a time when there was low community transmission.Participants: Model-simulated Victorian population.Intervention: From May 2020, policy changes to ease restrictions were simulated (e.g. opening/closing businesses) in the context of interventions that included testing, contact tracing (including via a smartphone app), and quarantine.Main outcome measure: Simulated epidemic rebound following relaxation of restrictions.Results: Policy changes leading to the gathering of large, unstructured groups with unknown individuals (e.g. bars opening, increased public transport use) posed the greatest risk of epidemic rebound, while policy changes leading to smaller, structured gatherings with known individuals (e.g. small social gatherings) posed least risk of epidemic rebound. In the model, epidemic rebound following some policy changes took more than two months to occur. Model outcomes support continuation of working from home policies to reduce public transport use, and risk mitigation strategies in the context of social venues opening. Conclusions: Care should be taken to avoid lifting sequential COVID-19 policy restrictions within short time periods, as it could take more than two months to detect the consequences of any changes.

AB - Objectives: We assessed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic risks associated with relaxing a set of physical distancing restrictions.Design: An agent-based model, Covasim, was used to simulate network-based transmission risks in households, schools, workplaces, and a variety of community spaces (e.g. public transport, parks, bars, cafes/restaurants) and activities (e.g. community or professional sports, large events). Setting: The model was calibrated to the COVID-19 epidemiological and policy environment in Victoria, Australia, between March and May 2020, at a time when there was low community transmission.Participants: Model-simulated Victorian population.Intervention: From May 2020, policy changes to ease restrictions were simulated (e.g. opening/closing businesses) in the context of interventions that included testing, contact tracing (including via a smartphone app), and quarantine.Main outcome measure: Simulated epidemic rebound following relaxation of restrictions.Results: Policy changes leading to the gathering of large, unstructured groups with unknown individuals (e.g. bars opening, increased public transport use) posed the greatest risk of epidemic rebound, while policy changes leading to smaller, structured gatherings with known individuals (e.g. small social gatherings) posed least risk of epidemic rebound. In the model, epidemic rebound following some policy changes took more than two months to occur. Model outcomes support continuation of working from home policies to reduce public transport use, and risk mitigation strategies in the context of social venues opening. Conclusions: Care should be taken to avoid lifting sequential COVID-19 policy restrictions within short time periods, as it could take more than two months to detect the consequences of any changes.

M3 - Journal article

JO - Medical Journal of Australia

JF - Medical Journal of Australia

SN - 0025-729X

ER -

ID: 249902983