Modelling the impact of reducing control measures on the COVID-19 pandemic in a low transmission setting
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Modelling the impact of reducing control measures on the COVID-19 pandemic in a low transmission setting. / Scott, Nick; Palmer, Anna; Delport, Dominic; Abeysuriya, Romesh; Stuart, Robyn Margaret; Kerr, Cliff C; Mistry, Dina ; Klein, Daniel; Sacks-Davis, Rachel ; Heath, Katie; Hainsworth, Samuel ; Pedrana, Alisa ; Stoove, Mark ; Wilson, David ; Hellard, Margaret E .
I: Medical Journal of Australia, 2020.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Modelling the impact of reducing control measures on the COVID-19 pandemic in a low transmission setting
AU - Scott, Nick
AU - Palmer, Anna
AU - Delport, Dominic
AU - Abeysuriya, Romesh
AU - Stuart, Robyn Margaret
AU - Kerr, Cliff C
AU - Mistry, Dina
AU - Klein, Daniel
AU - Sacks-Davis, Rachel
AU - Heath, Katie
AU - Hainsworth, Samuel
AU - Pedrana, Alisa
AU - Stoove, Mark
AU - Wilson, David
AU - Hellard, Margaret E
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Objectives: We assessed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic risks associated with relaxing a set of physical distancing restrictions.Design: An agent-based model, Covasim, was used to simulate network-based transmission risks in households, schools, workplaces, and a variety of community spaces (e.g. public transport, parks, bars, cafes/restaurants) and activities (e.g. community or professional sports, large events). Setting: The model was calibrated to the COVID-19 epidemiological and policy environment in Victoria, Australia, between March and May 2020, at a time when there was low community transmission.Participants: Model-simulated Victorian population.Intervention: From May 2020, policy changes to ease restrictions were simulated (e.g. opening/closing businesses) in the context of interventions that included testing, contact tracing (including via a smartphone app), and quarantine.Main outcome measure: Simulated epidemic rebound following relaxation of restrictions.Results: Policy changes leading to the gathering of large, unstructured groups with unknown individuals (e.g. bars opening, increased public transport use) posed the greatest risk of epidemic rebound, while policy changes leading to smaller, structured gatherings with known individuals (e.g. small social gatherings) posed least risk of epidemic rebound. In the model, epidemic rebound following some policy changes took more than two months to occur. Model outcomes support continuation of working from home policies to reduce public transport use, and risk mitigation strategies in the context of social venues opening. Conclusions: Care should be taken to avoid lifting sequential COVID-19 policy restrictions within short time periods, as it could take more than two months to detect the consequences of any changes.
AB - Objectives: We assessed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic risks associated with relaxing a set of physical distancing restrictions.Design: An agent-based model, Covasim, was used to simulate network-based transmission risks in households, schools, workplaces, and a variety of community spaces (e.g. public transport, parks, bars, cafes/restaurants) and activities (e.g. community or professional sports, large events). Setting: The model was calibrated to the COVID-19 epidemiological and policy environment in Victoria, Australia, between March and May 2020, at a time when there was low community transmission.Participants: Model-simulated Victorian population.Intervention: From May 2020, policy changes to ease restrictions were simulated (e.g. opening/closing businesses) in the context of interventions that included testing, contact tracing (including via a smartphone app), and quarantine.Main outcome measure: Simulated epidemic rebound following relaxation of restrictions.Results: Policy changes leading to the gathering of large, unstructured groups with unknown individuals (e.g. bars opening, increased public transport use) posed the greatest risk of epidemic rebound, while policy changes leading to smaller, structured gatherings with known individuals (e.g. small social gatherings) posed least risk of epidemic rebound. In the model, epidemic rebound following some policy changes took more than two months to occur. Model outcomes support continuation of working from home policies to reduce public transport use, and risk mitigation strategies in the context of social venues opening. Conclusions: Care should be taken to avoid lifting sequential COVID-19 policy restrictions within short time periods, as it could take more than two months to detect the consequences of any changes.
M3 - Journal article
JO - Medical Journal of Australia
JF - Medical Journal of Australia
SN - 0025-729X
ER -
ID: 249902983