Estimating latency from inhibitory input

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Estimating latency from inhibitory input. / Levakova, Marie; Ditlevsen, Susanne; Lansky, Petr.

I: Biological Cybernetics, Bind 108, Nr. 4, 2014, s. 475-493.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Levakova, M, Ditlevsen, S & Lansky, P 2014, 'Estimating latency from inhibitory input', Biological Cybernetics, bind 108, nr. 4, s. 475-493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-014-0614-6

APA

Levakova, M., Ditlevsen, S., & Lansky, P. (2014). Estimating latency from inhibitory input. Biological Cybernetics, 108(4), 475-493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-014-0614-6

Vancouver

Levakova M, Ditlevsen S, Lansky P. Estimating latency from inhibitory input. Biological Cybernetics. 2014;108(4):475-493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-014-0614-6

Author

Levakova, Marie ; Ditlevsen, Susanne ; Lansky, Petr. / Estimating latency from inhibitory input. I: Biological Cybernetics. 2014 ; Bind 108, Nr. 4. s. 475-493.

Bibtex

@article{3314d1b67ec24e9bacf2131d96f25a43,
title = "Estimating latency from inhibitory input",
abstract = "Stimulus response latency is the time period between the presentation of a stimulus and the occurrence of a change in the neural firing evoked by the stimulation. The response latency has been explored and estimation methods proposed mostly for excitatory stimuli, which means that the neuron reacts to the stimulus by an increase in the firing rate. We focus on the estimation of the response latency in the case of inhibitory stimuli. Models used in this paper represent two different descriptions of response latency. We consider either the latency to be constant across trials or to be a random variable. In the case of random latency, special attention is given to models with selective interaction. The aim is to propose methods for estimation of the latency or the parameters of its distribution. Parameters are estimated by four different methods: method of moments, maximum-likelihood method, a method comparing an empirical and a theoretical cumulative distribution function and a method based on the Laplace transform of a probability density function. All four methods are applied on simulated data and compared.",
author = "Marie Levakova and Susanne Ditlevsen and Petr Lansky",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s00422-014-0614-6",
language = "English",
volume = "108",
pages = "475--493",
journal = "Biological Cybernetics",
issn = "0340-1200",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating latency from inhibitory input

AU - Levakova, Marie

AU - Ditlevsen, Susanne

AU - Lansky, Petr

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Stimulus response latency is the time period between the presentation of a stimulus and the occurrence of a change in the neural firing evoked by the stimulation. The response latency has been explored and estimation methods proposed mostly for excitatory stimuli, which means that the neuron reacts to the stimulus by an increase in the firing rate. We focus on the estimation of the response latency in the case of inhibitory stimuli. Models used in this paper represent two different descriptions of response latency. We consider either the latency to be constant across trials or to be a random variable. In the case of random latency, special attention is given to models with selective interaction. The aim is to propose methods for estimation of the latency or the parameters of its distribution. Parameters are estimated by four different methods: method of moments, maximum-likelihood method, a method comparing an empirical and a theoretical cumulative distribution function and a method based on the Laplace transform of a probability density function. All four methods are applied on simulated data and compared.

AB - Stimulus response latency is the time period between the presentation of a stimulus and the occurrence of a change in the neural firing evoked by the stimulation. The response latency has been explored and estimation methods proposed mostly for excitatory stimuli, which means that the neuron reacts to the stimulus by an increase in the firing rate. We focus on the estimation of the response latency in the case of inhibitory stimuli. Models used in this paper represent two different descriptions of response latency. We consider either the latency to be constant across trials or to be a random variable. In the case of random latency, special attention is given to models with selective interaction. The aim is to propose methods for estimation of the latency or the parameters of its distribution. Parameters are estimated by four different methods: method of moments, maximum-likelihood method, a method comparing an empirical and a theoretical cumulative distribution function and a method based on the Laplace transform of a probability density function. All four methods are applied on simulated data and compared.

U2 - 10.1007/s00422-014-0614-6

DO - 10.1007/s00422-014-0614-6

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 24962079

VL - 108

SP - 475

EP - 493

JO - Biological Cybernetics

JF - Biological Cybernetics

SN - 0340-1200

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 122430858