Training quantum embedding kernels on near-term quantum computers

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Training quantum embedding kernels on near-term quantum computers. / Hubregtsen, Thomas; Wierichs, David; Gil-Fuster, Elies; Derks, Peter Jan H.S.; Faehrmann, Paul K.; Meyer, Johannes Jakob.

In: Physical Review A, Vol. 106, No. 4, 042431, 2022, p. 1-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hubregtsen, T, Wierichs, D, Gil-Fuster, E, Derks, PJHS, Faehrmann, PK & Meyer, JJ 2022, 'Training quantum embedding kernels on near-term quantum computers', Physical Review A, vol. 106, no. 4, 042431, pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.106.042431

APA

Hubregtsen, T., Wierichs, D., Gil-Fuster, E., Derks, P. J. H. S., Faehrmann, P. K., & Meyer, J. J. (2022). Training quantum embedding kernels on near-term quantum computers. Physical Review A, 106(4), 1-18. [042431]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.106.042431

Vancouver

Hubregtsen T, Wierichs D, Gil-Fuster E, Derks PJHS, Faehrmann PK, Meyer JJ. Training quantum embedding kernels on near-term quantum computers. Physical Review A. 2022;106(4):1-18. 042431. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.106.042431

Author

Hubregtsen, Thomas ; Wierichs, David ; Gil-Fuster, Elies ; Derks, Peter Jan H.S. ; Faehrmann, Paul K. ; Meyer, Johannes Jakob. / Training quantum embedding kernels on near-term quantum computers. In: Physical Review A. 2022 ; Vol. 106, No. 4. pp. 1-18.

Bibtex

@article{f7898dee168c456e9519a897eb46e36d,
title = "Training quantum embedding kernels on near-term quantum computers",
abstract = "Kernel methods are a cornerstone of classical machine learning. The idea of using quantum computers to compute kernels has recently attracted attention. Quantum embedding kernels (QEKs), constructed by embedding data into the Hilbert space of a quantum computer, are a particular quantum kernel technique that is particularly suitable for noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices. Unfortunately, kernel methods face three major problems: Constructing the kernel matrix has quadratic computational complexity in the number of training samples, choosing the right kernel function is nontrivial, and the effects of noise are unknown. In this work, we addressed the latter two. In particular, we introduced the notion of trainable QEKs, based on the idea of classical model optimization methods. To train the parameters of the QEK, we proposed the use of kernel-target alignment. We verified the feasibility of this method, and showed that for our experimental setup we could reduce the training error significantly. Furthermore, we investigated the effects of device and finite sampling noise, and we evaluated various mitigation techniques numerically on classical hardware. We took the best performing strategy and evaluated it on data from a real quantum processing unit. We found that using this mitigation strategy demonstrated an increased kernel matrix quality. ",
author = "Thomas Hubregtsen and David Wierichs and Elies Gil-Fuster and Derks, {Peter Jan H.S.} and Faehrmann, {Paul K.} and Meyer, {Johannes Jakob}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 American Physical Society. ",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1103/PhysRevA.106.042431",
language = "English",
volume = "106",
pages = "1--18",
journal = "Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics",
issn = "1050-2947",
publisher = "American Physical Society",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Training quantum embedding kernels on near-term quantum computers

AU - Hubregtsen, Thomas

AU - Wierichs, David

AU - Gil-Fuster, Elies

AU - Derks, Peter Jan H.S.

AU - Faehrmann, Paul K.

AU - Meyer, Johannes Jakob

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 American Physical Society.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Kernel methods are a cornerstone of classical machine learning. The idea of using quantum computers to compute kernels has recently attracted attention. Quantum embedding kernels (QEKs), constructed by embedding data into the Hilbert space of a quantum computer, are a particular quantum kernel technique that is particularly suitable for noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices. Unfortunately, kernel methods face three major problems: Constructing the kernel matrix has quadratic computational complexity in the number of training samples, choosing the right kernel function is nontrivial, and the effects of noise are unknown. In this work, we addressed the latter two. In particular, we introduced the notion of trainable QEKs, based on the idea of classical model optimization methods. To train the parameters of the QEK, we proposed the use of kernel-target alignment. We verified the feasibility of this method, and showed that for our experimental setup we could reduce the training error significantly. Furthermore, we investigated the effects of device and finite sampling noise, and we evaluated various mitigation techniques numerically on classical hardware. We took the best performing strategy and evaluated it on data from a real quantum processing unit. We found that using this mitigation strategy demonstrated an increased kernel matrix quality.

AB - Kernel methods are a cornerstone of classical machine learning. The idea of using quantum computers to compute kernels has recently attracted attention. Quantum embedding kernels (QEKs), constructed by embedding data into the Hilbert space of a quantum computer, are a particular quantum kernel technique that is particularly suitable for noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices. Unfortunately, kernel methods face three major problems: Constructing the kernel matrix has quadratic computational complexity in the number of training samples, choosing the right kernel function is nontrivial, and the effects of noise are unknown. In this work, we addressed the latter two. In particular, we introduced the notion of trainable QEKs, based on the idea of classical model optimization methods. To train the parameters of the QEK, we proposed the use of kernel-target alignment. We verified the feasibility of this method, and showed that for our experimental setup we could reduce the training error significantly. Furthermore, we investigated the effects of device and finite sampling noise, and we evaluated various mitigation techniques numerically on classical hardware. We took the best performing strategy and evaluated it on data from a real quantum processing unit. We found that using this mitigation strategy demonstrated an increased kernel matrix quality.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140263067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevA.106.042431

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevA.106.042431

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85140263067

VL - 106

SP - 1

EP - 18

JO - Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

JF - Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

SN - 1050-2947

IS - 4

M1 - 042431

ER -

ID: 324121839