On “Space” and “Geometry” in the Nineteenth Century
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review
Standard
On “Space” and “Geometry” in the Nineteenth Century. / Lützen, Jesper.
The Richness of the History of Mathematic: A Tribute to Jeremy Gray. Springer, 2023. p. 317 - 339 (Archimedes, Vol. 66).Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - On “Space” and “Geometry” in the Nineteenth Century
AU - Lützen, Jesper
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - What did mathematicians mean by the words “space” and “geometry” in the nineteenth century? This chapter will try to answer this question, starting with an analysis of Hertz’s, Lipschitz’ and Darboux’s geometrization of mechanics and continuing with a discussion of the use of the words by mathematicians who are usually credited as the principal inventors of non-Euclidean and higher dimensional geometries. The conclusion is that most mathematicians prior to 1880 used the words to denote (intuited) physical space and the geometry describing that space. This is the background against which one should evaluate the sometimes confusing nineteenth century discussions about the existence of geometries other than Euclid’s geometry. The question was radically changed with the advent of modernist structuralist mathematics, as described in (Gray, Plato’s Ghost: the modernist transformation of mathematics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1994). © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
AB - What did mathematicians mean by the words “space” and “geometry” in the nineteenth century? This chapter will try to answer this question, starting with an analysis of Hertz’s, Lipschitz’ and Darboux’s geometrization of mechanics and continuing with a discussion of the use of the words by mathematicians who are usually credited as the principal inventors of non-Euclidean and higher dimensional geometries. The conclusion is that most mathematicians prior to 1880 used the words to denote (intuited) physical space and the geometry describing that space. This is the background against which one should evaluate the sometimes confusing nineteenth century discussions about the existence of geometries other than Euclid’s geometry. The question was radically changed with the advent of modernist structuralist mathematics, as described in (Gray, Plato’s Ghost: the modernist transformation of mathematics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1994). © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-031-40855-7_13
DO - 10.1007/978-3-031-40855-7_13
M3 - Book chapter
T3 - Archimedes
SP - 317
EP - 339
BT - The Richness of the History of Mathematic
PB - Springer
ER -
ID: 380358962